The Mining Executive
"Global Mining Decisions In Your Palms"

The Collapse of a mining titan merger: Inside the Failed Acquisition of Anglo American by BHP

“The company was unable to reach an agreement with Anglo American on our specific views in respect of South African regulatory risk and cost.”

Mike Henry,

Chief Executive Officer,


In the corporate world of mining, where giants roam and fortunes are made and lost in the blink of an eye, a tale of grandeur and intrigue unfolds. It is a narrative that speaks of power struggles and shifting paradigms, where industry titans compete for supremacy through acquisitions and mergers. At the heart of this narrative lay the potential acquisition of Anglo American by BHP, a move that could have heralded the end of an era in the mining domain.

The potential merger of BHP and Anglo American was not merely a transaction; it was a seismic event poised to redefine the very foundations of the industry. The implications were staggering, with consequences that could have reverberated across the globe.

BHP’s pursuit of Anglo American for £31.1 billion, driven by a desire to bolster its copper operations, set the stage for a showdown of monumental proportions. However, Anglo American swiftly rejected BHP’s proposals, denouncing the proposed takeover as “highly unattractive” and “opportunistic.” The backdrop to this drama was the surging demand for copper, fueled by the growing needs of the renewable energy sector. With forecasts predicting a price surge to $15,000 per tonne by 2025, the stakes had never been higher.

Stuart Chambers, the chair of Anglo American, lamented, “The BHP proposal is opportunistic and fails to appreciate Anglo American’s true value.” Yet, amidst the clash of corporate giants, a myriad of questions loomed large. Would this acquisition usher in a new era of dominance or mark the decline of an industry stalwart? Could the combined might of BHP and Anglo-American render them too formidable to falter, dictating terms to governments and communities alike? And what of the smaller mining entities caught in the crossfire, threatened by the emergence of a new goliath?

The genesis of this potential acquisition can be traced back through the annals of history, to the founding days of both companies. Anglo American, born in the crucible of South Africa’s mining landscape in 1917, boasts a storied legacy spanning over a century. In contrast, BHP, founded as a mining venture in Australia in 1885, has burgeoned into a global powerhouse over the decades.

The proposed merger signified a seismic shift in the mining milieu. Should it have come to fruition, a giant would have emerged, wielding unparalleled control over the world’s mineral wealth. This shift could have reshaped competition dynamics and commodity prices, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the industry’s landscape.

However, amidst the allure of synergy and scale lay a tapestry of challenges and uncertainties. The fate of employees hung in the balance, as mergers often herald a wave of restructuring and layoffs. While assurances were made to mitigate job losses, the reality remained stark for many. Also, the impact on host communities could not be overstated. Mining corporations, perennial subjects of scrutiny, face heightened scrutiny in the wake of such mergers. The merger of divergent cultures and practices posed tough challenges to sustainability and corporate social responsibility efforts.

Moreover, from a financial standpoint, shareholders were bracing themselves for a rollercoaster ride of uncertainty. While mergers hold the promise of enhanced value creation, they also foreshadow integration difficulties and operational disruptions. Success hinged on the ability of both entities to harmonize strategies and cultures, forging a cohesive entity poised for success.

However, the saga took an unexpected turn when BHP pulled out of its planned takeover of Anglo American, a deal that would have been valued at £38.6 billion. The collapse of the deal followed a month of wrangling between the two giants, culminating in a frantic back-and-forth this week.

Anglo American rejected BHP’s calls to extend talks, while BHP complained of being denied access to “key information” from Anglo during the negotiations “despite numerous requests.” BHP’s CEO Mike Henry stated that the company was “unable to reach an agreement with Anglo American on our specific views in respect of South African regulatory risk and cost.”

Stuart Chambers insisted that Anglo American would provide greater value for shareholders independently. “Our shareholders will benefit from value transparency and undiluted exposure to a simpler portfolio of world-class assets, consistently stronger operational performance, and highly attractive growth in copper, premium iron ore, and crop nutrients,” Chambers stated.

Furthermore, BHP attempting to ease concerns about its plans for Anglo American’s business in South Africa, where Anglo has major operations. BHP made commitments including job security for employees and proposed maintaining current staff levels at Anglo’s Johannesburg office. However, Anglo American rejected the extension plea, arguing that the deal terms were still not good enough.

The discussions had been ongoing since Anglo American rejected BHP’s first takeover approach, a £31.1 billion offer, at the end of April. Anglo then rejected BHP’s subsequent offers, including the final £38.6 billion bid, while some Anglo shareholders urged continued negotiations. Concerns about BHP’s proposal to spin off the South African businesses further complicated matters.

Ultimately, Anglo announced its own plans to break up its business, focusing on key areas such as copper, premium iron ore, and crop nutrients, while selling or spinning off major parts of the firm, including its De Beers diamond operation and its platinum division. Despite BHP’s series of proposals to address concerns, including commitments to South Africa, Anglo remained unmoved.

Conclusively, the collapse of the BHP-Anglo American merger left the industry and stakeholders pondering the future. The saga of these two giants underscored the complexities and high stakes of corporate mergers, leaving a lasting impact on the global mining landscape. The narrative of grandeur and intrigue, power struggles, and shifting paradigms continues to unfold in the ever-evolving world of mining.


This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More